About Me

Name: ChaplainStevens
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Myths About Islam

The Myth:

Islam is intolerant of enslaving human beings.  The religion eradicated the institution of slavery thanks to the principles set in motion by Muhammad, who was an abolitionist.

The Truth:

There is not the least bit of intolerance for slavery anywhere in the Qur’an.  In fact, the “holy” book of Islam explicitly gives slave-owners the freedom to sexually exploit their slaves – not just in one place, but in at least four separate Suras.  Islamic law is littered with rules concerning the treatment of slaves, some of which are relatively humane, but none that prohibit the actual practice by any stretch.

The very presence of these rules (along with the fact that Muhammad owned and traded slaves) condones and legitimizes the institution of slavery.  As such, this deeply dehumanizing horror has been a ubiquitous tradition of Islam since the days of Muhammad to the current plight of non-Muslims in the Sudan, Mali, Niger and Mauritania, as well as other parts of the Muslim world.

There has never been an abolitionary movement within Islam (just as the religion produces no organized resistance to present-day enslavement).  The abolition of slavery was imposed on the Islamic world by European countries, along with other political pressures that were entirely unrelated to Islamic law.

Although horrible abuses of slaves in the Muslim world were recorded, there has been little inclination toward the documentation and earnest contrition that one finds in the West.  The absence of a guilty conscience often leads to the mistaken impression that slavery was not as bad under Islam... when it is actually indicative of the tolerance that the religion has for the practice

So narcissistic is the effect of Islam on the devoted, that to this day many Muslims believe in their hearts that the women and children carried off in battle, and their surviving men folk, were actually done a favor by the Muslim warriors who plucked them from their fields and homes and relegated them to lives of demeaning servitude. 

Shame and apology, no matter how appropriate, are almost never to be found in Dar al-Islam.  Caliphs, the religious equivalent of popes, maintained harems of hundreds, sometimes thousands of young girls and women captured from lands as far away as Europe and consigned to sexual slavery.  Hungarians were hunted like animals by the Turks, who carried 3 million into slavery over a 150 year period.

African slaves were often castrated by their Muslim masters.  Few survived to reproduce, which is why there are not many people of African descent living in the Middle East, even though more slaves were taken out of Africa in the 1300 years of Arab slave trading than in the 300 years of European slavery.  The 400,000 slaves brought to America, for example, have now become a community of 30 million, with a much higher standard of living than their African peers.

There is no William Wilberforce or Bartoleme de las Casas in Islamic history as there is in Christianity.  When asked to produce the name of a Muslim abolitionist, apologists sometimes meekly suggest Muhammad himself.  But, if a slave owner and trader, who commanded the capture and sexual exploitation of slaves, and left a 13-century legacy of religiously-based slavery, is the best that Islam can offer, then no amount of sophistry will be enough to convince any but the most ignorant.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

False Prophets

2 Timothy 2:14b-19

Introduction

Scripture clearly affirms that God is truth, that God speaks truth, and that God cannot lie. Scripture also affirms that Satan is a liar and the father of lies. He is in the business of deceiving people. God reveals Himself as truth and Satan is revealed as its antithesis. That particular dichotomy pervades every area of the universe. There is conflict between the holy angels and unholy demons. There is conflict on earth between the truth of God and the lies of Satan.

The people of God have always been plagued with false doctrine. They have endured the invasion of false prophets and teachers throughout the ages. Satan attempts to confuse the world by drowning it in a sea of deceit. It was Satan's misrepresentation of the truth to Eve that plunged the human race into sin (Gen. 3:1-6). The steady stream of false teaching has been so cumulative that it is wider and deeper now than it has ever been. False teaching about God, Christ, the Bible, and spiritual reality is pandemic. The father of lies works overtime to destroy the saving, sanctifying truth God has given to us in His Word. The effects of false teaching have been devastating and damning. That's why the Bible calls them destructive heresies (2 Pet. 2:1). I believe that as we get closer to the coming of Christ, these deceptions, lies, and misrepresentations will increase.

Any servant of the Lord must be aware of false teachers and warn others about their lies. That is why the apostle Paul warned the believers and leaders in Ephesus (Acts 20:29-30).

Second Timothy 2:14-19 specifically tells us why we should avoid false teaching. Paul had called Timothy to be a faithful servant of the Lord. He asked him to rise above the influence of ungodliness, evil teaching, and evil people, and to set the church right. To do so he had to keep his mind on the truth of God, and be sure that he and his people avoided the impact of false teaching.

Lesson

I. REMINDING TRUE TEACHERS (v. 14a)

"Remind them of these things."

The literal translation would read, "Remind of these things." The word "them" was added because it identifies who is being reminded-- the faithful men of verse 2. What things were they to be reminded of? What Paul said in verses 1-13. Paul wanted Timothy to remind the church leaders and teachers of their responsibility to pass on the truth to others. They needed to be reminded of the noble cause they served and the loftiness of the gospel ministry.

II. AVOIDING FALSE TEACHING (vv. 14b-19)

A transition takes place from Paul's positive reminder to his negative command. In verse 14 he says, "Solemnly charge them." Timothy was not just to continually remind the people of the noble cause they serve, but also to "solemnly charge (Gk., diamarturomai, a legal term) them in the presence of God not to wrangle about words." The positive aspect show the believer what to do; the negative tells him what not to do.

A. It Ruins the Hearers (v. 14b)

"Solemnly charge them in the presence of God not to wrangle about words, which is useless, and leads to the ruin of the hearers."

1. The seriousness of the command

a) A constant reminder

The Greek word translated "solemnly charge" communicates the idea of a constant reminder and a constant command. Timothy was to constantly remind the leaders of their positive duty and constantly warn them to avoid false teaching. The warning is serious because diamarturomai refers to a solemn command.

b) A healthy fear

Paul's solemn command is made even more serious by the next phrase in verse 14, "Solemnly charge them in the presence of God." The leaders were to do their duty out of a healthy fear of God. Paul had given such changes before:

(1) 1 Timothy 5:21--"I solemnly charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus and of His chosen angels, to maintain these principles without bias."

(2) 1 Timothy 6:13-14--"I charge you in the presence of God, who gives life to all things, and of Christ Jesus, who testified the good confession before Pontius Pilate, that you keep the commandment without stain or reproach."

(3) 2 Timothy 4:1--"I solemnly charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by His appearing and His kingdom: preach the Word."

Those are all serious commands. They are not just commands but solemn commands, and not just solemn commands but solemn commands in the presence of God. The intention of the solemn charge is to put fear in the hearts of God's people by reminding them that they are directly accountable to God.

Exploring the Presence of God

1. As a comforting reality

a) Psalm 68:8--"The heavens also dropped rain at the presence of God."

b) Luke 1:19--The angel told Zacharias, "I am Gabriel, who stands in the presence of God; and I have been sent to speak to you, and to bring you this good news."

c) Hebrews 9:24--"Christ did not enter a holy place made with hands, a mere copy of the true one, but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us."

d) Genesis 27:7--Isaac said, "Bring me some game and prepare a savory dish for me, that I may eat, and bless you in the presence of the Lord."

2. As a means of judgment

The presence of God is meant to comfort. But the vast majority of references have to do with judgment.

a) Psalm 68:2--"As wax melts before the fire, so let the wicked perish before God."

b) Genesis 3:8--Adam and his wife hid themselves after they had sinned so they wouldn't have to face the presence of God.

c) Psalm 97:5--"The mountains melted like wax at the presence of the Lord, at the presence of the Lord of the whole earth."

d) Psalm 114:7--"Tremble, O earth, before the Lord, before the God of Jacob."

e) 2 Thessalonians 1:9--"[Unbelievers] shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power" (KJV).

While there are times when the presence of the Lord is meant to of comfort us, it is more often meant to increase our sense of accountability. We are always in the presence of God, and His presence acts as a controlling factor on how we live. He monitors each of our lives. A solemn charge in the presence of God makes its recipients accountable before the Holy One, the righteous judge. 

2. The specifics of the command

Given such a serious command, you would expect Paul to name some vile evil that Timothy was to command people to withdraw from. But Paul says, "Solemnly charge them in the presence of God not to wrangle about words."

a) The rejection of word battles

The Greek word translated "wrangle about words" speaks of waging a war of words. Paul called for the leadership to avoid futile debates because they would end up being will be side-tracked. Evidently the errorists in Ephesus tended to focus on such worthless chatter, which was based on speculation and not on the Word of God (1 Tim. 1:3-4; cf. 1 Tim. 6:3-10). Timothy was not to be drawn into word battles because they are not based on God's special revelation.

(1) Satan's strategy

The Screwtape Letters by C.S. Lewis tell of an older demon, Screwtape, writing to a younger demon, Wormwood, about how to be effective in dealing with people. In his first letter Screwtape said, "Your man has been accustomed, every since he was a boy, to have a dozen incompatible philosophies dancing about together inside his head. He doesn't think of doctrines as primarily `true' or `false,' but as `academic' or `practical'.... Jargon, not argument, is your best ally in keeping him from the Church" ([N.Y.: Macmillan, 1961], p. 8). Demons know that true science and reason will not contribute to their cause--deception. Speculations, not facts, must fill men's minds. All "good" demons will use that strategy because it obscures biblical truth by focusing on temporal concerns.

(2) The church's legacy

Such jargon has infiltrated many of today's colleges and seminaries. Also, many television evangelists and preachers barrage the church with jargon about their false religious systems. It's had an effect. How else can you explain why some churches have reached the place where they advocate abortion, women preachers, homosexuality, and divorce for any reason? Why has the church allowed unholy leaders to remain in leadership? How it is that husbands no longer lead their homes, and wives have no commitment to the lives of their children? How could the church ever buy into the self-esteem movement at the expense of humility and service to others? Jargon has invaded the church. That's because the church is willing to listen to the world. It is willing to put the Bible alongside the reason of man. In 2 Timothy 2:14 Paul calls the world's jargon useless. Worse than that, it's demonic. First Timothy 4:1-2 speaks of doctrines spawned by demons spoken through hypocritical liars.

b) The result of word battles

Paul said these word battles lead to the ruin of the hearers." The Greek word translated "ruin" (katastroph[ma]e) means "to overturn," "to subvert," "to upset," or "to overthrow." False teaching doesn't edify; it tears down. It doesn't strengthen; it weakens.

Katastroph[ma]e is used only one other time in the New Testament, in 2 Peter 2:6, which gives us insight into the kind of ruin Paul was referring to. Peter said God "condemned the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah to destruction [katastroph[ma]e] by reducing them to ashes." There katastroph[ma]e means "total devastation." Paul used it in the same sense in 2 Timothy 2:14--word battles totally destroy the hearers. They lead to the damnation of people's eternal souls. That's why 2 Peter 2:1 calls them destructive heresies that bring about swift destruction. Second Peter 3:16 says, "The untaught and unstable distort [Paul's teaching], as they do also the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction." We are called to stay away from false teaching because it has the potential of damning the eternal souls of those under its influence.

B. It Shames the Teachers (v. 15)

"Be diligent to present yourself approved to God as a workman who does not need to be ashamed, handling accurately the word of truth."

1. The key word

The key word is "ashamed." Anyone who teaches anything other than what accurately reflects the word of truth ought to be ashamed. Shame is the painful feeling that arises from an awareness of having done something dishonorable. Anyone who propagates false teaching has reason to ashamed when he faces God. False teaching is worthy of condemnation by God, not commendation. It doesn't matter to God how many degrees they have or how erudite they might be. They have every reason to stand before God in shame for mishandling God's precious Word.

2. The key response

a) Be diligent

If you're a teacher how do you avoid being ashamed before the Lord? Second Timothy 2:15 says, "Be diligent" (Gk., (spoudaz[ma]o, "to give diligence," "to give maximum effort," or "to do your best"). Teaching God's Word requires maximum effort. That's why 1 Timothy 5:17 says, "Let the elders who rule well be considered worthy of double honor, especially those who work hard at preaching and teaching." It is hard work.

b) Present yourself approved to God

The Greek word translated "present yourself" in 2 Timothy 2:15 (parist[ma]emi) means "to stand alongside." You should desire to stand alongside God.

Paul then says, "Present yourself approved." The Greek word translated "approved" means "proven to be worthy after testing." What is the goal of the teacher? To make a maximum effort so he might someday stand alongside God unashamed because he has proven himself to be worthy. Paul told the Galatians that he was not a manpleaser (1:11). The goal of the apostle Paul was to please God. In 1 Thessalonians 2:4 he says, "Just as we have been approved by God to be entrusted with the gospel, so we speak, not as pleasing men but God, who examines our hearts." The teacher who stands before the Lord and hears, "Well done, good and faithful servant" is one who made a maximum effort.

c) Be a hard worker

The Greek word translated "workman" (ergat[ma]es) communicates the idea of energy. It refers to a worker or laborer, not a student. The hard worker is committed to maximum effort so he might come before his master and show him that his work is worthy. As a result he "does not need to be ashamed."

d) Handle the word of truth accurately

In 2 Timothy 2:15 Paul says, "to handle accurately the word of truth." The literal meaning of the Greek word translated "handling accurately" (orthotome[ma]o) is cutting a straight line.

(1) The method

(a) Its pattern

Orthotome[ma]o was used for any task that required a straight line. For example, it was used for cutting a straight line with a saw. It was used for making a straight path through woods or mountains. It was used for building a building, when a straight edge needed to be cut on stone to be sure the building was built level. It was used of cutting a straight line on cloth. It was used of cutting straight lines on hides so they could be pieced together to make a tent.

Paul was a leather worker. We often say he was a tentmaker, but a better translation of the Greek word is leather worker. He used animal hides, skins, and perhaps woven hair to make things, possibly tents. You can imagine that anyone making a tent would have to piece together a lot of hides. He would have cut each one just right so he could fit them together. It would be similar to dressmaking. If you don't cut the pieces right from the pattern, the dress won't look or fit right.

(b) Its principle

If you don't know how to cut the pieces, you can't make the whole product fit. The same is true in the spiritual realm--biblical theology and exegesis are interdependent. Every teacher must be committed to handling accurately (cutting straight) the Word of truth.

(2) The message

"Word of truth" (2 Tim. 2:15) is a phrase used other times in Scripture.

(a) Ephesians 1:13--"After listening to the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation." The message or word of truth refers to the gospel.

(b) James 1:18--"He [God] brought us forth by the word of truth."

(c) John 17:17--Jesus said, "Thy word is truth." Here the word of truth refers to all of God's revelation.

When you realize the importance of handling the gospel correctly, you've got to acknowledge that there is a lot of preaching today that doesn't. We have to handle the Word accurately so we don't misrepresent the gospel. We have to represent all the Word of God, not in a flippant, off handed way, but in the proper way. That requires diligence and a desire to be approved by God, not men. It demands that you be a workman.

C. It Leads to Ungodliness (v. 16)

"But avoid worldly and empty chatter, for it will lead to further ungodliness."

1. The degeneration of empty talk

The Greek word translated "avoid" means "to walk around" or "to keep clear of." What are we to avoid? Chatter--jargon of human wisdom apart from God's revelation. Paul called it "worldly [Gk., beb[ma]elos, "common, not set apart"] chatter." It is the common, profane, unholy talk of men.

He also called it "empty", which means it has no benefit--it yields no return. But empty words soon become evil words because empty words are like a vacuum. I have a vacuum in my garage I use to clean the car. Once in a while it sucks up something I don't want it to, like a pen or some coins. That's what happens with a vacuum--whatever gets near it rushes in. Empty words become evil words because they suck up sin. Useless talk on useless matters becomes wicked talk. Words that are not of God soon become unholy words.

2. The result of empty talk

False teachers claim to be advancing our thinking, expanding our minds, and leading us to new truth. But what they're saying actually "will lead to further ungodliness" (v. 16). False teachers are ungodly, and they pull down the people who hear them into their own ungodliness. Peter said "many will follow their sensuality" (2 Pet. 2:2). Ungodly conduct is always the fruit of ungodly doctrine.

D. It Spreads Like Gangrene (v. 17a)

"Their talk will spread like gangrene."

Gangrene is dead flesh. The bacterial kind spreads very fast. The Greek word translated "gangrene" (gangraina) can refer to a spreading, consuming disease. To cure gangrene, the patient is sometimes placed in a hyperbaric chamber to expose the affected tissues to oxygen at high pressure, thereby killing the bacteria, which need an oxygen-free environment. The patient is then treated with antibiotics. Gangrene is like a prairie fire. Jude 23 tells us to "save others, snatching them out of the fire." False teaching is a malignancy--it eats up the neighboring tissue and spreads its corrupting doctrine to infect others.

E. It Can lead to Apostasy (vv. 17b-18)

1. The definition of apostasy (vv. 17b, 18a)

"Among them are Hymenaeus and Philetus, men who have gone astray from the truth."

Hymanaeus and Philetus were apostates, having erred from the truth--like those referred to in Hebrews 6:4-6: "In the case of those who have once been enlightened and have tasted of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers of the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, and then have fallen away, it is impossible to renew them again to repentance." That's because they in essence "trampled under foot the Son of God, and ... regarded as unclean the blood of the covenant by which [they were] sanctified, and ... insulted the Spirit of grace" (Heb. 10:29).

2. The error of apostasy (v. 18b)

"Saying that the resurrection has already taken place."

These apostates probably believed that the resurrection was nothing more than some mystical experience you had when you went from the unenlightened life to the enlightened life. They probably were buying into a philosophical heresy that was prevalent at the time.

A denial of the resurrection is a major error. In 1 Corinthians 15:13-14 Paul says that if there were no resurrection of the dead, then Christ never rose. And if Christ never rose, then neither will we be. A doctrine that denies the resurrection cuts the heart out of the gospel. It's a denial of eternal life in a glorified body like Christ's--the essence of the Christian hope.

3. The effect of apostasy (v. 18c)

"Thus they upset the faith of some."

The Greek word translated "upset" literally means "to overturn." The people whose faith was overturned obviously had a non-saving faith. That's because no one can overturn real faith (e.g. John 10:27-29; Rom. 8:30). Second Peter 2:18 says false teachers speak "out arrogant words of vanity they entice by fleshly desires, by sensuality, those who barely escape from the ones who live in error." Those who are overturned are those who are looking for God, wanting to believe, and are beginning to open up to the gospel. But they come under false teaching and it destroys their weak, non-saving faith. False religious systems wait to suck in the people who are looking for answers to the pains and pressures of life.

F. It Characterizes People Who Don't Belong to the Lord (v. 19)

1. The solid foundation (v. 19a)

Verse 19 says, "Nevertheless, the firm foundation of God stands." The firm foundation of God is the church--the redeemed. We are the true people of God who form the solid, immovable foundation that false teachers can't uproot. False teachers will ruin some, shame some, lead some into ungodliness, corrupt some, and overturn the faith of some, but not the elect of God. We are a building not made with hands. We are the temple of the living God. We are the church Christ is building. The gates of hell will not prevail against (Matt. 16:18). We are those who, having had a good work begun in us, will see it completed on the day of Jesus Christ (Phil. 1:6). We are those who will never be separated from the love of God in Christ (Rom. 8:35). We are those of whom Jesus said, "All that the Father gives Me shall come to Me .... that of all that He has given Me I lose nothing, but raise it up on the last day" (John 6:37, 39). False teaching may devastate the souls of many people, and it may confuse believers from time to time, but the foundation of the church of God in Christ is firm. First John 2:14 says, "You are strong, and the word of God abides in you, and you have overcome the evil one." God called out a people for salvation and eternal glory before the world began.

2. The guaranteed salvation (v. 19b)

Verse 19 says, "Having this seal." A seal was a mark of ownership, just as a builder put his name on the cornerstone to identify it as a building he built. We are the foundation of God, namely His church. He has stamped us as belonging to Him.

a) Sovereign election

"The Lord knows those who are His."

The church can never be touched by false teachers because we are His. He holds us in His sovereign power. We are His for eternity. The first seal we have is we are the elect. That seal is affixed to God's foundation. It guarantees permanence and makes dissolution impossible. In Matthew 7:22-23 the Lord says, "Many will say to Me on that day, `Lord, Lord ...; And then I will declare to them, `I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness.'" They can't disturb the divine foundation. It will stand because we are the elect and the Lord knows who we are. Second Thessalonians 2:13 says, "God has chosen you from the beginning for salvation."

b) Personal sanctification

"Let everyone who names the name of the Lord abstain from wickedness."

To name the name of the Lord is to be identified with Him. If you belong to the Lord, abstain from wickedness. God's people are not only elect, but also called to righteousness. God's election is an election to holiness. Our salvation is made up of God's predestining mercy and our inevitable duty. Paul said, "You have been bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body" (1 Cor. 6:20). If we name the name of the Lord, we'll abstain from wickedness. It is both an exhortation and an affirmation. The one who names the name of the Lord will not apostatize but turn away from sin.

The two quotes in 2 Timothy 2:19 appear to be from Numbers 16. Korah rebelled against God, and many people joined him. But God judged them. Verse 5 says, "The Lord will show who is His." That is almost the same wording as the first statement in 2 Timothy 2:19: "The Lord knows those who are His." When Korah and his friends gathered against Moses and the rest of the people, Moses affirmed that the Lord knew who belonged to Him. The second statement in 2 Timothy 2:19 parallels Moses' command to the people in Numbers 16:26: "Depart now from the tents of these wicked men, and touch nothing that belongs to them."

God will come in judgment, but He knows who He will spare because they belong to Him. We know who they are because they will depart from the tents of wickedness. From the divine side, they're elect; from the human side, they're obedient. All the false teaching Satan wants to bring across our path will avail nothing because we stand firm on the foundation of God. Just as the rebellion under Korah ended in judgment, so will that of every false teacher.

Focusing on the Facts

1. What did Paul want Timothy to remind the true teachers of (2 Tim. 2:14; see pp. 1-2)?

2. The leaders in the church at Ephesus were to perform their duty with what in mind (2 Tim. 2:14; see p. 2)?

3. Explain the two aspects of the presence of God (see pp. 3-4).

4. What was the solemn charge that Paul wanted Timothy to communicate to the leaders in Ephesus? Explain (see p. 4)?

5. What has invaded the church through the false teachers? What kind of effect is it having on today's church (see p. 5)?

6. What does the future hold for those who listen to "word battles" (2 Tim. 2:14; see p. 5)?

7. What is the key word of 2 Timothy 2:15? Why (see p. 6)?

8. What four things must believers do to avoid being teachers who will be ashamed before God? Explain each (see pp. 6-7)?

9. Explain the literal meaning of the phrase "handling accurately" (see p. 7).

10. What is the principle that Paul is teaching by the statement "handling accurately the word of truth" (see pp. 7-8)?

11. What is the "word of truth" (see p. 8)?

12. According to 2 Timothy 2:16, what are believers to avoid? Why (see p. 8)?

13. If people listen to false teachers, what will they be led into (2 Tim. 2:16; see p. 9)?

14. What error were Hymenaeus and Philetus propagating? Why is it a major error (2 Tim. 2:18; see p. 10)?

15. Why did certain people have their faith overturned by listening to the error of the false teachers (see p. 10)?

16. What is the firm foundation of God (see p. 10)?

17. What are the two aspects of the seal God has put on us? Explain each one (see p. 11).

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Biblical Response to Jehovah's Witnesses

  1. Their attacks on the Deity of Jesus. 
    1. Why did Jesus pray to the Father? (John 17).
      1. Because as a man He needed to pray to the Father.
      2. Because He was both God and man (Col. 2:9; John 8:58 with Ex. 3:14).
        1. The two natures of Christ are why we have two types of scripture concerning Jesus: those that seem to focus on His divine-side, and those that seem to focus on His human-side. The Jehovah's Witnesses are simply ignoring, or changing, the divine-side scriptures and concentrating on those that describe His human-side.
    2. Why did He say the Father was greater than He (John 14:28)?
      1. This is because His position was different than that of God, not His nature.
      2. Heb. 2:9 that Jesus is made for a little while lower than the angels; that is, when He became a man. The Father sent the Son (1 John 4:10).
    3. Why did He say, "Why call me good, only God is good?" (Luke 18:19)?
      1. Jesus was confirming His own deity because what He was doing was good.
      2. Ask them, "Was Jesus good?"
    4. Why did Jesus say that He could only do those things that He saw the Father do? (John 5:19).
      1. This is an interesting verse and it is one that proves the divinity of Christ, not that He wasn't God.
      2. Ask the Jehovah's Witness who can do the same things God the Father can do? Could an angel? Could a man? Of course not. Jesus, however, says He could do whatever He saw the Father do. "I tell you the truth, the Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees his Father doing, because whatever the Father does the Son also does."
    5. The answer to these and other verses like them is that Jesus has two natures. Jesus was fully man as well as fully God and as a man there will be verses that show His humanity.
  2. Witnessing Approaches using the Bible.
    1. John 1:1: They translate as "In the beginning was the word and the word was with God and the word was a god."
      1. Ask if Satan is a true god or a false God. The Jehovah's Witness will say a false god. Then have them read aloud John 1:1 again in their Bible and ask them if Jesus is a true god or a false one. If he says "true god," he's in trouble because that would make Jesus true God -- which the JW's do not believe. If he says "false god," he's in trouble because that would make Jesus a false God.
      2. If Jesus is a god, then doesn't that mean there are two gods? They often answer, "Yes. But Jesus is not the Almighty God, He is only the mighty god. And besides, there are those in the Bible who are called gods but really aren't."
        1. But, in Isaiah 10:21, God is called the Mighty God.  So if Jesus is not the Almighty God and only the mighty God, then that makes Jesus God since GOD is called the mighty God.
      3. The problem with this is that every God besides Jehovah is a false God. God says to have no other God before Him (Exodus 20:3) because they are not by nature gods (Gal. 4:8).
        1. But, there are those who are called gods such as Exodus 7:1 where God says to Moses, "See, I make you as God to Pharaoh, and your brother Aaron shall be your prophet," (NASB).  God is not, of course, making Moses a god, but He is saying that Moses will exhibit the power of God.  But Jesus is not said to be God in the same sense as Moses was said to be "as" God.
    2. Col. 1:15: Is used by the Jehovah's Witnesses to say that Jesus is the first created thing. This verse says, "He [Jesus] is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation."
      1. The Jehovah's Witnesses maintain that "firstborn" means first created. This cannot be the case because...
        1. There is a Greek word for "first created" and it is not used here.
        2. "First born" is proto, "first," with tikto "to bring forth, bear, produce."
        3. There is no word used in the New Testament for "first created." However, if there were, the construction would be proto, "first," with ktizo "to create." And this is not the construction used in Col. 1:1
      2. Firstborn can certainly mean the first one born in a family. However, it can also mean preeminence. For example:
        1. In Jeremiah 31:9, the firstborn title is attributed to one of the tribes of northern Israel. "They will come with weeping; they will pray as I bring them back. I will lead them beside streams of water on a level path where they will not stumble, because I am Israel's father, and Ephraim is my firstborn son."
      3. Understanding biblical culture is important when interpreting Scripture. Firstborn was a title, not only of the first born male, but also of preeminence which is precisely what is occurring when it is said that Jesus is the firstborn.
  3. Col. 1:15-17 in the Jehovah's Witness Bible has an addition of four words. Their version reads, "He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation; because by means of him all [other] things were created in the heavens and upon the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, no matter whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All [other] things have been created through him and for him. Also, he is before all [other] things and by means of him all [other] things were made to exist," (Their word "[other]" is in their Bible with the brackets. They maintain that they know it isn't in the original Greek Scriptures but the word is implied and should be there.)
    1. Instead of refuting the bad translation, simply ask them if this means that Jesus created everything. They will say yes. Review this and be very clear and get them to admit that it was Jesus who created everything. Then turn to...
      1. Isaiah 44:24 "This is what the LORD says -your Redeemer, who formed you in the womb: I am the LORD, who has made all things, who alone stretched out the heavens, who spread out the earth by myself."
      2. If Jesus created everything, then why does it say that the Lord (Jehovah in the Hebrew) did it by Himself?
      3. The only answer is that Jehovah is not simply the name of the Father, but that it is the name of God the Trinity. Therefore, since Jesus is God in flesh, it could be said that Jesus created all things and that Jehovah did it alone.
    2. You can also ask them to try to read the section of verses and omit the word "other". You will find it to be an interesting experience.
  4. John 8:58 in the Jehovah's Witness Bible says, "...Before Abraham came into existence, I have been."
    1. They have translated the present tense ego eimi, in the Greek, into the perfect tense, I have been. Though this can be done rarely in the New Testament, it is not correct here because Jesus was quoting the O.T. verse of Exodus 3:14 where God was telling Moses who He was: "God said to Moses, ‘I AM WHO I AM. This is what you are to say to the Israelites: "I AM has sent me to you."'" Jesus was purposely using the divine title: I AM.
    2. The Jehovah's Witness won't agree. So ask him if Jesus was saying that He "had been" before Abraham, then why does it say in the next verse that the Jews pick up stones to kill him?
    3. Additionally, about 250 years the Jews translated the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek. It is called the Septuagint, also known as LXX. In the Septuagint Exodus 3:14 is translated in the Greek in a present tense, i.e., I AM... The correct translation is, therefore, "Before Abraham was, I AM."
    4. If this verse should really be translated as "I have been" then why did the Jews want to kill Jesus? The answer is simple: They knew He was claiming to be God, see the next example.
  5. John 10:30-34 is a section of verses where the Pharisees say that Jesus is making Himself out to be God (v. 33).
    1. "I and the Father are one." Again the Jews picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus said to them, "I have shown you many great miracles from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?" "We are not stoning you for any of these," replied the Jews, "but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God."
    2. You can say, "See, even the Jews knew He was claiming to be God. The Jehovah's Witness (if he's quick enough) will say something like, "Jesus wasn't God, the Jew's only thought that Jesus was claiming to be God." Then you can say, "Oh, I see. Then let me get this right. You agree with the Pharisees, Jesus wasn't God? Is that correct? The Jehovah's Witness will not like it that he agrees with a Pharisee.
  6. Plurality in the Godhead
    1. The following group of scriptures strongly suggests a plurality within the Godhead. These verses are translated correctly in the Jehovah's Witness Bible so you can encourage them to use it. The NIV is not as literal in its translation in the Amos verses, so I recommend using either the King James or the New American Standard Bible when doing your own.
      1. Gen. 1:26, "Then God said, "Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness . . . "
        1. They will say that angels are the ones who helped God make man. However, there is no scriptural evidence for that. God is the only creator.
        2. You can also take him to Col. 1:15-17 where it says that Jesus is the creator of all things--including man.
      2. Gen. 19:24, "Then the LORD rained on Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven."
        1. Is this saying there are two Lords, two Jehovah's?
      3. Amos 4:10-11, "‘I sent a plague among you after the manner of Egypt; I slew your young men by the sword along with your captured horses, and I made the stench of your camp rise up in your nostrils; yet you have not returned to Me,' declares the LORD. ‘I overthrew you as God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah . . . '"
        1. Jehovah is the one talking and He says, "I overthrew you as God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah..." Very interesting.
      4. Isaiah 44:6, "Thus says the LORD, the King of Israel and his Redeemer, the LORD of hosts: ‘I am the first and I am the last, and there is no God besides me . . . ‘" See also, Isaiah 48:1
      5. If you are reading these verses to a Jehovah's Witness he might say something like, "Are you trying to show the Trinity from these verses?" You can then say, "You got the Trinity out of these? That's very interesting."
      6. These verses and others are more fully developed in The Plurality Study, which is a powerful tool for witnessing to the Witnesses.
  7. John 20:25 says, "The other disciples therefore were saying to him, ‘We have seen the Lord!' But he said to them, ‘Unless I shall see in His hands the imprint of the nails, and put my finger into the place of the nails, and put my hand into His side, I will not believe'" (NASB).
    1. The Jehovah's Witnesses deny that Jesus was crucified on a cross. They say it happened on a torture stake where His wrists were put together over His head and a single nail was put through both. If that is true, then why does Thomas say "Unless I shall see in His hands the imprint of the nails..." In the Greek the word used here for "nails", helos, is in the plural. Therefore, there was more than one nail used in the hands of the crucifixion of Christ.
  8. First and Last
    1. How many firsts and lasts are there? In the Bible God is called the first and last and so is Jesus. Since God says there is no God apart from Him and Jesus and God are both addressed by the same title, then that poses a problem for the Jehovah's Witness.
      1. Isaiah 44:6, "This is what the LORD says -Israel's King and Redeemer, the LORD Almighty: I am the first and I am the last; apart from me there is no God."
      2. Revelation 1:8, "I am the Alpha and the Omega," says the Lord God, "who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty."
      3. Revelation 1:17-18, "When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: "Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last. I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades."
        1. Obviously, Rev. 1:17-18 can only refer to Jesus.
      4. Revelation 22:12-13, "Behold, I am coming soon! My reward is with me, and I will give to everyone according to what he has done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End."
        1. Here, both the "Alpha and the Omega" and the "First and the Last" are said to be one and the same. 
        2. Also, at this point go to Titus 2:13 where it says that Jesus is the one who is coming soon, therefore, Jesus and Jehovah are the same.
  9. The Holy Spirit
    1. Jehovah's Witnesses teach that the Holy Spirit is an active force like radar. They deny that He is alive, that He is a person. This is, of course, because they deny the Trinity. Yet, if the Holy Spirit is simply a force then...
      1. Why is He called God (Acts 5:3-5)?
      2. How is it that He can teach (John 14:26)?
      3. How can He be blasphemed (Matt. 12:31,32)?
      4. How can be the one who comforts (Acts 9:31)?
      5. How is it possible for Him to speak (Acts 28:25)?
      6. How then can He be resisted (Acts 7:51)?
      7. How can He be grieved (Eph. 4:30)?
      8. How can He help us in our weaknesses (Rom. 8:26)?
    2. If the Holy Spirit is a force, then how is it possible that the above mentioned phenomena are attributed to Him? A force doesn't speak, teach, comfort, etc.
    3. Nor can you blaspheme against a force.
  10. The Resurrection of Jesus
    1. The Jehovah's Witnesses deny the physical resurrection of Jesus. They say that if the sacrifice of Jesus were real then the body had to stay in the grave. They say that He rose in a spirit body. This body was a manifestation similar to the way angels manifested themselves in the Old Testament.
      1. The problem with their view is that the angels were not incarnated. Jesus became a man by birth, therefore, He had a real, physical body, a permanent body. In fact, right now, Jesus is in heaven in the form of a man. He still has two natures, God and man, and will eternally be that.
    2. For scriptural proof of Jesus being raised in the same body He died in, consider the following verses.
      1. In John 2:19-22 before the crucifixion Jesus said, "Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up...He was speaking of the temple of His body." Since Jesus said He would raise the same body He died in, then it must be true.
        1. This last verse is worth focusing on. Remember, Jesus said He would be the one to raise His body. So, it must be true.
      2. John 20:27 -(to Thomas) "reach your finger...and put it into My side..."
        1. If Jesus were not raised from the dead, then why did He have a physical body. 
        2. They will reply that it was a temporary body materialized so the apostles would believe that He was raised. Yet, this is not what Jesus said in John 2:19-22.  He said He would raise His very body.
      3. Luke 24:39 - "a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see I have."
        1. Jesus said that He had "flesh and bones" not "flesh and blood." This is important because flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God (1 Cor. 15:50). The blood of Jesus was the sacrifice for sin (Rom. 5:9). It is the blood that cleanses us of our sin (Heb. 9:22). 
        2. The blood of Jesus was shed on the cross and so, most probably, Jesus doesn't have any functioning blood in His body.
  11. Similarities between the Jehovah's Witnesses and the Pharisees:
    1. Both deny the Trinity and the Deity of Christ
    2. Both deny the physical resurrection of Christ and salvation by grace alone.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »